Quarterly Current Affairs - January to March for Competitive Exams - Vol. From inception till the book comes out from print, the whole team comprising of. Latest Current Affairs in May, about Books. Crisp news summaries and articles on current events about Books for IBPS, Banking, UPSC. Our up to date selection of current affair books will help you up your general knowledge and crack those group discussions smoothly. Choose from English.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Indonesian|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Register to download]|
Get this list of books and authors current affairs which can be asked in your exam ? to face during the economic crisis when he joined RBI in September Books shelved as current-affairs: Between the World and Me by Ta-Nehisi Coates, The World Is Flat: A Brief avg rating — 9, ratings — published Current Affairs App is a simple app for getting daily current affairs. This app provides monthly basis current affairs in Hindi. We provide daily updates on current.
A Higher Loyalty: Strangers in Their Own Land: A Warning ebook by Madeleine K. Age of Ambition: The Unwinding: The Righteous Mind: No Logo Paperback by Naomi Klein. Too Big to Fail: The Tipping Point: We Were Eight Years in Power: Bad Blood: Black Flags: Just Mercy: Under the Banner of Heaven: I Am Malala: No Place to Hide: Surveillance State Hardcover by Glenn Greenwald.
His strengths and weaknesses, successes and failures. Bollywood takes you on a tour of the many highlights of Hindi cinema, from early films to modern-day creations. Immortal India Authored by: Amish Tripathi Trivia: The author helps you understand India like never before, through a series of sharp articles, nuanced speeches and intelligent debates.
C, who was one of the greatest Indian soldiers of the Kargil war. I am HIV Positive. So What? Authored By: Jayanta Lalita Trivia: The book talks about how an HIV-positive person mended his failing health, overcame psychological trauma, fought stigma and discrimination to become an international bodybuilding champion.
An early chapter is devoted to the analysis of an episode of the Danish political drama, Borgen, in order to: reveal the sophistication that audiences already possess; provide a set of benchmarks against which to judge the relative poverty of many — but not all — of the news and current affairs texts that follow; and spell out the additional reflexivity and conceptual refinement social theory can provide.
The interplay between the conceptual tools of social theory and the detail of current affairs texts about particular issues lies at the heart of my argument in the book. The power of the case studies, and ultimately of the book, rests or falls on how convincing its accounts of this interplay prove to be.
My purpose in this blog is to recount the steps that took me to the point of making the argument in the way I did, to signpost in a general way what is new in what the book offers, and to highlight the challenges social and cultural theorists need to respond to in order to communicate more clearly with a wider audience.
Naturally, in the process, I hope to engage theorists sufficiently for them to want to read the book. The various case studies listed above represent the end result of a protracted process in which I grappled with a series of intellectual and presentational obstacles.
One problem confronting my resolve to try and bring theory to bear on the realm of current affairs was immediately obvious. The language of news and current affairs, especially at the sharp end of television news and newspaper coverage — whether in paper or digital form — is simply a long way from the language of social theory.
This poses a problem for any theorist, whatever their special interests, attachments and orientations. If we feel that social theory has something to contribute, and we are serious about enabling it to do just that, then we need to take on the challenge of thinking through how the two languages might be brought into meaningful dialogue with each other.
How can they connect, so that each can inform the other? Of course, something in the general vicinity of this has already been attempted by a number of eminent sociologists, cultural analysts, and media and communications researchers, either engaging directly with news and current affairs texts or, more tangentially, in looking at the political economy or political sociology of news production and effects.
These attempts fall into two main types.
These critics implicitly suggest that they could do it better if only they were given the opportunity. Analysts reveal the techniques of persuasion at work. However, what has not previously been attempted, and what Why Current Affairs Needs Social Theory provides, is the construction, on the basis of social theory, of guidelines that can be used to assess the quality of the knowledge within current affairs texts. That is, guidelines that can not only assist one to reveal the techniques of persuasion, but can also enable one to focus in on the specifics of knowledge claims, and the extent to which these are substantiated by evidence.
The idea is that the guidelines form the pedagogical basis through which audiences can increase their capacity to make informed, critically assured, judgements about the quality of knowledge claims made in news and current affairs texts. The guidelines themselves lead one, firstly, to focus in a particular way on the techniques of persuasion at work in a text. The guidelines then turn to looking beyond the techniques of persuasion to questions focused on the quality of knowledge about causation, strategy, and so on, provided by the texts.
All of this is done with sensitivity to the fact that accounts are always provided from within a particular ideological frame or value position.
This is to insist that social theory should be given the task of investigating just how good, or bad, news and current affairs texts are at giving us access to what is happening in the world.
Texts are mediated representations of the world, their selections, combinations and inflections influenced by a myriad of factors.
They do not simply provide a picture of how things were, or are, in and of themselves. They indicate how things appear from within a particular perspective. Any notion of good and bad texts, adequate and inadequate accounts, has to start from this vantage point.
Central to my own argument is the insistence that concepts lucid or haphazard are a key ingredient of any perspective, and that how texts combine concepts and evidence is key to the way in which they mediate the world.
But, without a doubt, such theoretical scruples and concerns make it difficult to clear a path of easy communication between the world of social theory and the world of news and current affairs.
It is patent that the necessary cavils, caveats and equivocations of social theorists — here around issues of epistemology — take us into the realm of the abstract and the abstruse, which is unfamiliar and uncomfortable territory for most audiences, journalists and news editors alike.
All this is only intensified once we harness the realm of epistemology to the realm of ontology.
Here we bring in the variety of conceptual shapes and generalisations that theorists use to sketch in the characteristics of the substantive entities and relations that make up the social world. These difficulties need to be acknowledged as the first step in the struggle to work out how best to overcome them. Even the most open-minded theorists have their theoretical preoccupations and biases.
Mine are around ideas of social structure, agency, contextual fields, meaning, time, space, power, culture, norms and ethics. For me, a way needs to be found to bring the conceptual shapes associated with these favoured notions into dialogue with the empirical evidence manifested in, or absent from, the words and images of current affairs reports. Having noted these leanings, however, the approach endorsed and advocated, in Why Current Affairs Needs Social Theory, is nevertheless, open, inquisitive, and ecumenical.
It is liberal in the best sense of that word.
My belief is that any meta-theoretical or substantive-theoretical approach worth its salt should be able to guide, and bring illumination to, readings of news and current affairs without renouncing its integrity.